data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7312d/7312dd89fc488c15f614f3b3aa6e9497a03d520a" alt=""
This comes on the heels of editor Jamie Kirchick exposing almost certainly harmful info on the independent-minded congressman from Texas.
I don't mean to cast aspersions, but Paulists are known to be extraordinarily net-savvy, not to mention zealous and strongly opposed to establishment media organs. Certainly, the Paul campaign sanctioned no extra-legal 'direct action', but could some pugnacious "hacktivists" have taken it upon themselves to settle the score, so to speak?
1 comment:
Thank you, spambot, for providing us all with such much needed, unbiased, sincere information.
*le sigh*
Post a Comment